Scientific and Technical Journal

ELECTROTECHNIC AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS

ISSN Print 2221-3937
ISSN Online 2221-3805
TARGETED FORMING OF RANKING SPACE OF UNIVERSITY EVALUATION
Abstract:

The problem of ensuring the adequacy of the university evaluation by ranking systems is considered. The evaluation university process with ranking systems is considered as a process of complex objects evaluation. The converted space of university evaluation is proposed, its basic properties are considered. A method of the targeted space forming for university evaluation is proposed that allows comparing the ranking system of universities, and ensuring the adequacy of the evaluation results.

Authors:
Keywords
DOI
References

1. Krisilov V.A., Liubchenko V.V., Kavitska V.S. Metody celeorientirovannoj ocenki adekvatnosti [The methods for goal-oriented estimation of model adequacy], (2012). Proceedings of Odes. Polytechnic. Univ., vol. 2 (39), pp. 160 – 164. (in Russian).

2. Berlin principles on ranking of higher education institutions (in English). Available at: http://ireg-observatory.org/en/index.php/berlin-principles (accessed 01.03.2016)

3. Scott P. Ranking higher education institutions: a critical perspective (2013). Rankings and Accountability in Higher Education: Uses and Misuses, Unesco, pp. 113 − 127. (in English).

4. Marope M., Wells P. University Rankings: The Many Sides of the Debate, (2013). Rankings and Accountability in Higher Education: Uses and Misuses, Unesco, pp. 7 − 19. (in English).

5. Amsler S., Bolsmann C. University ranking as social exclusion (2012). British journal of sociology of education, vol. 33.2, pp. 283 − 301. (in English).

6. Salmi J., Alenoush S. League tables as policy instruments: Uses and misuses (2007). Higher Education Management and Policy, vol. 19.2, pp. 31 − 68. (in English).

7. Huang, Mu-H. A comparison of three major academic rankings for world universities: From a research evaluation perspective (2011). Journal of library and information studies, vol. 9.1, pp. 1 − 25. (in English).

8. Krisilov V.А. Metody formalizacii celej provedenija rejtingov [Methods of formalization of ranking goals], (2007). Ranking of higher education institutions: state, trends and problems. collective monography, Simferopol, pp. 55 – 72. (in Russian).

9. Cymbal V.P. Teorija informacii i kodirovanija [Information theory and coding], (1982). Kiev, “High School”, 304 p. (in Russian).

10. Krisilov V.A., Judin S.A., Krisilova N.V. Problemy “lozhnoj” kompaktnosti v diskretnom prostranstve priznakov v zadachah taksonomii [Problems of “false” compactness in the discrete space characteristics in taxonomy tasks], (2004). Proceedings of Odes. Polytechnic. Univ., vol. 2 (21), pp. 91 – 97. (in Russian).

Published:
Last download:
2017-11-16 09:15:40

[ © KarelWintersky ] [ All articles ] [ All authors ]
[ © Odessa National Polytechnic University, 2014. Any use of information from the site is possible only under the condition that the source link! ]
Яндекс.Метрика