Scientific and Technical Journal


ISSN Print 2221-3937
ISSN Online 2221-3805

The problem of ensuring the adequacy of the university evaluation by ranking systems is considered. The evaluation university process with ranking systems is considered as a process of complex objects evaluation. The converted space of university evaluation is proposed, its basic properties are considered. A method of the targeted space forming for university evaluation is proposed that allows comparing the ranking system of universities, and ensuring the adequacy of the evaluation results.


1. Krisilov V.A., Liubchenko V.V., Kavitska V.S. Metody celeorientirovannoj ocenki adekvatnosti [The methods for goal-oriented estimation of model adequacy], (2012). Proceedings of Odes. Polytechnic. Univ., vol. 2 (39), pp. 160 – 164. (in Russian).

2. Berlin principles on ranking of higher education institutions (in English). Available at: (accessed 01.03.2016)

3. Scott P. Ranking higher education institutions: a critical perspective (2013). Rankings and Accountability in Higher Education: Uses and Misuses, Unesco, pp. 113 − 127. (in English).

4. Marope M., Wells P. University Rankings: The Many Sides of the Debate, (2013). Rankings and Accountability in Higher Education: Uses and Misuses, Unesco, pp. 7 − 19. (in English).

5. Amsler S., Bolsmann C. University ranking as social exclusion (2012). British journal of sociology of education, vol. 33.2, pp. 283 − 301. (in English).

6. Salmi J., Alenoush S. League tables as policy instruments: Uses and misuses (2007). Higher Education Management and Policy, vol. 19.2, pp. 31 − 68. (in English).

7. Huang, Mu-H. A comparison of three major academic rankings for world universities: From a research evaluation perspective (2011). Journal of library and information studies, vol. 9.1, pp. 1 − 25. (in English).

8. Krisilov V.А. Metody formalizacii celej provedenija rejtingov [Methods of formalization of ranking goals], (2007). Ranking of higher education institutions: state, trends and problems. collective monography, Simferopol, pp. 55 – 72. (in Russian).

9. Cymbal V.P. Teorija informacii i kodirovanija [Information theory and coding], (1982). Kiev, “High School”, 304 p. (in Russian).

10. Krisilov V.A., Judin S.A., Krisilova N.V. Problemy “lozhnoj” kompaktnosti v diskretnom prostranstve priznakov v zadachah taksonomii [Problems of “false” compactness in the discrete space characteristics in taxonomy tasks], (2004). Proceedings of Odes. Polytechnic. Univ., vol. 2 (21), pp. 91 – 97. (in Russian).

Last download:
2017-11-16 09:15:40

[ © KarelWintersky ] [ All articles ] [ All authors ]
[ © Odessa National Polytechnic University, 2014. Any use of information from the site is possible only under the condition that the source link! ]